The main subject of this post is a recently finished sculpture exploring simplicity of form. This latest sculpture is about sculptural form and material: concave, convex, transitions, edges, and texture. I decided from the outset that simplicity was going to be key to the clarity of the intention. Simplicity, I have come to be convinced, is a good principle of expression in abstract form.
I would, however, first like to go back in time for a moment to illustrate the history and the thinking from which this latest clay form ensues.
In my preliminary musings I found myself reading through some past posts, two of which - dating back to December 2010 - I found very satisfying to rediscover, so much so that I feel I should include a reference to them here.
The first:
and this passage in particular:
I love the simplicity, the serenity of this form; it sits there quietly, but there is a huge amount going on; simplicity through complexity. It also has that 'universal' element I've referred to previously, the almost mathematical dimension.
The second:
this passage in particular:
It reminds me of another statement I saw on the dust extractor at a studio space at Fondazione Sem in Pietrasanta. It was the workspace of a sculptor called Armen Agop - http://www.armenagop.com - (do take a look at this website), a fascinating character, both as an artist and as a person, whose work I admire greatly.
He had written this first in Arabic, followed by the English translation:
This was a highly inspirational encounter, both because of him and the surroundings in which he worked and because of this statement. I have had discussions with artists who feel that simplicity equals boring; they need more going on in a sculpture (painting, ...) to keep their interest. I wonder whether they might be missing the point ...
Here are a couple more images of his studio space:
He had written this first in Arabic, followed by the English translation:
This was a highly inspirational encounter, both because of him and the surroundings in which he worked and because of this statement. I have had discussions with artists who feel that simplicity equals boring; they need more going on in a sculpture (painting, ...) to keep their interest. I wonder whether they might be missing the point ...
Here are a couple more images of his studio space:
And now on to the main subject of this post:
The reason, I think, for this latest piece to have turned out as it has was my discovery of a new/different clay: a beautiful soft white when raw and a glorious texture to play with, and an equally beautiful, and slightly more luminous, soft white when fired, all of which are good foundations for exploring simplicity. Perfect joy!
So, as I said, this piece is about sculptural form and material: concave, convex, transitions, edges, and texture:
The convex and concave
The transitions from one to the other
the edges
And texture
Have I got it right or have I taken the 'simplicity' quest too far? Food for thought ...
And just for the joy of reminiscing, this was the piece I was working on at the time of my visit to Fondazione Sem in Pietrasanta, on a stone-carving retreat in the nearby Seravezza; a sculpture entitled "Pietra Santa". Happy memories ...
And, befitting the subject of this post, Inner Room, an alabaster carving I entered in the 2010 Brighton HOUSE Open Exhibition. The theme was "Regeneration"; this was my Artist Statement:
Inner Room is about the inner space
within the prolate spheroid - the egg, symbol of new life -
and the Möbius,
its continuous edge offering a constant and secure sanctuary:
enter the calm of your inner room
to reflect, to contemplate,
to regenerate.
No comments:
Post a Comment